Great! Thanks Théo! Looking great.
We should may pin some topic / message?
Another tweak we could do is to add before the talk title "[Day 1 - 04]"
as for the paper numbeR?
I will also edit the paper titles to link to the zoom meeting / pdf when available
Another tweak we could do is to add before the talk title "[Day 1 - 04]"
The topic length is limited and I thought that if there is a direct link from the program to each topic, then it's not really necessary.
as for the paper numbeR?
AFAICT the paper numbers are only relevant to discussions within the PC and with authors.
I mean the order on the day, could work well for visually locating the corresponding topic for those hanging out
if we have a limitation we could use [1/02]
?
OK, sure. [1/02] would designate the second talk on the first day? Given that there are no more than 7 talks in a given day, I'd rather make it [D1-2] or [05/1] ... [05/6], [06/1] ... [06/7].
Sure, [D1] [M1] would work
Sorry
[S1] = Sunday 1st
[M2] = Monday 2nd
or any variation you'd like
Umm, it seems I cannot pin topics, etc...
Neither move topics, etc...
Sounds good! Though, let's wait for the schedule to be definitive before changing the topic names (note that this means that the links to the topics will also have to be updated).
I don't think that the pinning feature exists in Zulip.
What do you call "moving" topics?
Can't you rename topics?
For example I was trying to move your message to Miscellaneous and I cannot
I can rename tho
so will there be any opportunity to ask J.-C. Filliatre any questions about Coq 7.0 development and similar topics? In the workshop or perhaps even in the chat? I don't see a topic for this here.
suggestion: for panelists and the keynote speaker, it might be good to add affiliation(s) to the workshop website
Looking promising! BTW, can you mention the M1/S2 naming convention in a more prominent place?
Also, do you plan to record the talks? That’s especially interesting for those who’ll submit to POPL 3-4 days later!
Karl Palmskog said:
so will there be any opportunity to ask J.-C. Filliatre any questions about Coq 7.0 development and similar topics? In the workshop or perhaps even in the chat? I don't see a topic for this here.
Yes, we've just forgot to add a topic for this.
Paolo G. Giarrusso said:
Also, do you plan to record the talks? That’s especially interesting for those who’ll submit to POPL 3-4 days later!
See what's written on the website:
The workshop will also be recorded, but some of the talk recordings may be accessible only to registered participants depending on speakers' consent.
Doh, thanks!
at PLDI, some people were nice and continued to answer questions in the chat after their session. Would be very convenient if people flagged up if they will do this.
Karl Palmskog said:
at PLDI, some people were nice and continued to answer questions in the chat after their session. Would be very convenient if people flagged up if they will do this.
We're expecting most speakers / co-authors to have this attitude here as well. I don't see the need for flagging topics.
Théo Zimmermann said:
We're expecting most speakers / co-authors to have this attitude here as well. I don't see the need for flagging topics.
Well, I meant that it could be convenient if speakers explicitly said in the stream at the end of their session, "I will be around in the chat for the next hour, my co-author X will also be." - the chair could also ask about this. Some people likely have other engagements, so good to know constraints.
how many minutes of questions are there in each regular presentation again?
We aim for 15+5 @Karl Palmskog
Of course each speaker can vary a bit
Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias said:
We aim for 15+5 Karl Palmskog
I think the ideal for us, if possible, would be more like 17+3 to fit a small demo (and I will stay in the Zulip topic for quite long afterwards to answer questions there)
Sure, that's your call I think.
Hi all, we will open the streaming very soon.
Will you be streaming the coffee break?
https://coq-workshop.gitlab.io/2020/#program
I don't think so.
At least, not IJCAR-FSCD coffee break room
It's possible that the streaming of the Coq workshop room won't stop during coffee breaks.
@Bas Spitters I think so; but it won't be archived
for this coffee break likely not
I mean for the others
@Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Only 39 people here. Should the stream be announced more widely?
@Gaëtan Gilbert Is 39 the number of people subscribed, or "present"?
it's the number of people subscribed
We will upload the slides for today after the last session
@Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias should I email you the slides?
@Karl Palmskog please!
Is the session open? I'm trying to connect but I'm having troubles. If I connect as a regular user, it kicks me out saying that I'm a panelist and I've to use the link they provide. If I use the link it seems so connect but then no window shows up
@Enrico Tassi That's weird because the link in the e-mail worked for me and several of us.
could you just try to make me not a panelist
an promote me later?
The issue is that for now the room is only open to panelists.
Just to be sure, I've received an email and I take the link for "click here to join". then the tool asks me "please enter your meeting ID"
I'm putting the 912 888 ... thing, is that right?
You're using the wrong e-mail, the one you received because you are registered as a participant.
Subject: Panelist for The Coq Workshop 2020
OK, this is the correct e-mail then.
The problem is then that Zoom doesn't do anything when you click the "Launch meeting" link.
I'll do a reboot, just in case zoom is very broken
Don't worry, we are going to quit practice mode now.
You should be able to join using the meeting ID now.
And we'll promote you as panelist when you join.
it still does not work, it tells me "if you were invited as a panelist..."
Even if you use the link on the workshop page?
If it doesn't work in your desktop client, feel free to use the web client instead.
Dear all, the first session of the second day of the workshop will start in 5 minutes, you can already join the Zoom chat
We wil enable the streaming in 5 minutes
Youtube link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tROOcO44Uho&feature=youtu.be
Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias said:
Dear all, the first session of the second day of the workshop will start in 5 minutes, you can already join the Zoom chat
The two youtube links on the website link to day 1 streaming, did you post the day 2 link ?
Pierre Corbineau said:
Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias said:
Dear all, the first session of the second day of the workshop will start in 5 minutes, you can already join the Zoom chat
The two youtube links on the website link to day 1 streaming, did you post the day 2 link ?
It is online now, thanks.
@Pierre Corbineau indeed we had to start the session then update the page, sorry, there is likely a way to know the link zoom will use in advance but we didn't manage
where do we ask questions for the Coq Dev Team session? [edit: saw it now]
@Karl Palmskog see the stream just bumped
Thank you!
Great WS!
Thanks to the organizers and everyone else! :clap:
And the double channel: zoom + zulip, was really nice to have!!!
Thanks to the organizers for this great workshop !!
Thanks for this workshop. :slight_smile:
Thanks to the organizers :clap: It went well and was really interesting!
Thanks a lot to everyone who participated by asking questions, presenting papers, panelists, and especially the session chairs. Great job everyone!
Great organization and very interesting presentations! Thanks! :clap:
Thanks everybody!
Slides are up [some missing, please send to us] , sliced videos should be up soon, meanwhile the streamed versions should be still up
I think we forgot to thank the PC as well :grimacing:
Thank you everybody that participated in making this possible.
Indeed, thanks to the PC of course!!!
And thanks to the IJCAR/FCSD organizers, who had a very difficult job, to the panel moderators who worked pretty hard to coordinate everyone, and to the session chairs.
And sorry for indeed a few things that could have been handled better from the organization, indeed at some point there was quite a bit of uncertainty on the way to proceed due to all the circumstances, but at least I think we learned quite a few things.
Thanks for the great workshop!
Last updated: Oct 03 2023 at 02:34 UTC