Hi, when using explicit universe levels we can use algebraic in some cases (like in the type of an inductive type) but is it possible to use it in the type of definitions?
In particular I have some function
foo@{i j} : Type@{i} -> Type@{j}
(* i j ||= i < j *)
and I'm wondering if I can turn it into
foo@{i} : Type@{i} -> Type@{i+1}
ping @Matthieu Sozeau ?
I guess the answer is that what I want to do is not possible.
Yep, not yet!
Ok thanks!
Last updated: Sep 30 2023 at 06:01 UTC