We have this PR on mathcomp-analysis that uses hierarchy-builder : https://github.com/math-comp/analysis/pull/253 .
It compiles fine on my laptop with hierarchy-builder.0.10.0 and Coq 8.12 (all via opam) but the CI fails.
I can't guess what is wrong by looking at the build output.
Would you have a hint?
O_o
wow
I know nothing about nix, but I see
unpacking 'https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp-nix/archive/master.tar.gz'...
unpacking 'https://github.com/CohenCyril/nixpkgs/archive/mathcomp-1.11fix.tar.gz'...
unpacking 'https://github.com/math-comp/math-comp/archive/mathcomp-1.11.0.tar.gz'...
unpacking 'https://github.com/math-comp/finmap/archive/master.tar.gz'...
unpacking 'https://github.com/math-comp/bigenough/archive/master.tar.gz'...
unpacking 'https://github.com/math-comp/real-closed/archive/master.tar.gz'...
unpacking 'https://github.com/math-comp/analysis/archive/integral_sketch_hb.tar.gz'...
and nothing about HB
... is there a nix file to update?
There is confix.nix
with this contents:
{
coq = "8.10";
mathcomp = "mathcomp-1.11.0";
mathcomp-real-closed = "1.1.1";
}
It might be that I need to add some entry for hb but the format does not look uniform :-)
These looks like tag names
or at least, the git tags in MC are named mathcomp-$version (probably my fault)
A ghost from the cvs/svn era... since I'm not a big fan of v$version
I did choose mathcomp-
in place of v
, but in git a tag can just be a number :-/
so it might be "v0.10.0" because of https://github.com/math-comp/hierarchy-builder/releases/tag/v0.10.0 ?
Hem... I guess so
Enrico Tassi said:
A ghost from the cvs/svn era... since I'm not a big fan of
v$version
I did choosemathcomp-
in place ofv
, but in git a tag can just be a number :-/
Wait... The tag for hb starts with a "v" ^_^
I'll go find my sackcloth ;-)
Last updated: Sep 09 2024 at 04:02 UTC