Is there a reason why finfun
is only equipped with an eqType
for the non-dependent version? I find these ffun
/ dffun
quite hard to work with.
We should check whether the problem that Georges reported back then about Coq 8.9 unification mechanizm is still actual and if not merge ffun
and dffun
...
That would be super useful. Or adding notations for [ffun ...]
that go in dffun
.
Otherwise, you end adding a lot of type annotations.
Would you mind opening an issue about this?
Pierre-Yves Strub said:
That would be super useful. Or adding notations for
[ffun ...]
that go indffun
.
The latter is obviously simpler to do a posteriori
I am opening a ticket
Last updated: Oct 13 2024 at 01:02 UTC