Karl Palmskog (Dec 17 2021 at 09:33): Karl Palmskog (Dec 17 2021 at 09:33):after we switched the opam archive PR to non-Nix CI for producing JSON files, I'm getting a ton of these seemingly cache-based errors:
$ chmod +x /usr/local/bin/opam
$ set -o pipefail
$ . scripts/opam-coq-setup-root # collapsed multi-line command
.Initializing opam root
gzip: stdin: decompression OK, trailing garbage ignored
tar: Child returned status 2
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
Cleaning up project directory and file based variables
ERROR: Job failed: exit code 1
For example: https://gitlab.com/coq/opam-coq-archive/-/jobs/1896046372
@Enrico Tassi do you know what's going on? Can we somehow flush all caches and see if it helps?
Gaëtan Gilbert (Dec 17 2021 at 09:54):try putting set -x in the multiline command so you can see what it's doing
Karl Palmskog (Dec 17 2021 at 09:59):OK, let's be clear. There is in my view a forced choice between debugging the archive CI and reviewing PRs with packages. I don't have cycles for both. Maybe I'll try the set -x thing in a week or so, if nobody else does.
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 10:52):Clearly, the cache is corrupted. Presumably by the line opam update default >> $1 which should have been opam update default >> $LOG.
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 10:57):Sorry, I saw this bug yesterday
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 10:58):the problem is that 2 jobs use the same cache file
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 10:58):it is easy to fix, I'll do that after lunch
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:00):maybe @Gaëtan Gilbert can help, I'd like a variable containing the job name to be used here:
https://github.com/coq/opam-coq-archive/blob/e95b4f39b372ef59cfed71ac8410965b782fb1fc/.gitlab-ci.yml#L18
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:01):that shall fix the problem
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:01):I'm sorry but I saw the problem late yesterday night and I forgot
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 11:03):The problem is not that two jobs are using the cache. The problem is that your script is corrupting it.
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:04):It is corrupting the gzip file, since 2 jobs may regenerate the same cache file
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:04):the new job runs on the same compiler of another job
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:04):and the cache file name is only after that, not the job name itself :-/
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:05):I did not see it coming because I was only re-running the new job.
But now it runs in parallel with the other jobs
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 11:05):No! Your script is doing echo crap >> $CACHE!
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 11:05):Having a single cache for several jobs is perfectly fine.
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:06):oops, where?
I though it was the upload from the worker to the cache (of the same file at the same time) resulting in a corruption
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:07):oh shit, I see
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 11:07):opam update default >> $1
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:07):then the fix is easy, let me do it now
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 11:07):By the way, why did you rename the job? Presumably the artifact will not be found anymore; will it?
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:08):no, I think I named the artifact correctly
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 11:09):Sure, but the artifact is found through the job name, isn't it?
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:10):boh, I don't know how the deployment works. I'll trust you blindly and fix it
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:11):There you are: https://github.com/coq/opam-coq-archive/pull/1997 now I really need to get to eat
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 11:13):I don't know either. But if I had done it, I would have used https://gitlab.com/coq/opam-coq-archive/-/jobs/artifacts/master/download?job=json-data which clearly depends on the job name.
Enrico Tassi (Dec 17 2021 at 11:14):The artifact itself has a name... anyway, I did revert that change
Guillaume Melquiond (Dec 17 2021 at 11:18):Sure, but again, artifacts are per job. You need to provide a job name to access an artifact, whatever its name.
Last updated: Apr 18 2024 at 07:02 UTC