It works! The bot has minimized ci-mathcomp for https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/14328 at https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/14328#issuecomment-846289071. (Still working on figuring out how to minimize ci-elpi.)

What is the problem?

I mean, I don't expect the minimizer to di anything special for Coq-Elpi. For a typical file, see https://github.com/math-comp/hierarchy-builder/blob/master/structures.v. Sequences of Elpi commands are used to "assemble programs", no way to minimize them. Then Elpi commands/tactics are just like regular commands/tactics. Coq-Elpi itself has a large (and messy) test suite with in-line Elpi code, but this is not how final products look like. Finally, `foo.elpi`

files, once `Elpi Accumulate File "foo.elpi"`

, are shipped within the .vo file, so no need to do anything special with them anyway.

I guess the problem is the one described here: https://coq.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/237656-Coq-devs.20.26.20plugin.20devs/topic/Relocating.20Coq.20install.3F

That was the first issue; I was able to fix it by symlinking the expected build directory to the real one while running `make ci-elpi`

. The current issue is

```
File "/tmp/.coq-native/Ntmpychg3keq.native", line 1:
Error: /github/workspace/builds/coq/coq-failing/_install_ci/lib/coq/../coq-core/kernel/nativevalues.cmi
is not a compiled interface for this version of OCaml.
It seems to be for an older version of OCaml.
Error: Native compiler exited with status 2
```

Both versions of Coq are built with 4.05.0 --- https://gitlab.com/coq/coq/-/jobs/1279122981#L267 and https://gitlab.com/coq/coq/-/jobs/1281044492#L294 --- do the artifacts somehow have incompatible versions of OCaml? Both seem to have the same version of of the docker image: https://gitlab.com/coq/coq/-/jobs/1279122981#L176 and https://gitlab.com/coq/coq/-/jobs/1281044492#L205 both say bionic_coq-V2021-04-30-2b30c6dc00. Can someone with more knowledge of the native compiler help me figure out what's going on here?

Making progress here: I've kludged around this by passing `-native-compiler ondemand`

when it's supported. I've found and fixed a bug in my minimization script where it tried to use the same user-contrib for both versions of Coq.

But now I've run into an error that I don't know how to fix, but maybe @Enrico Tassi does. At https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/14328#issuecomment-846572612,

```
Declare ML Module "ltac_plugin".
Module Export AdmitTactic.
Module Import LocalFalse.
Inductive False := .
End LocalFalse.
Axiom proof_admitted : False.
Tactic Notation "admit" := abstract case proof_admitted.
End AdmitTactic.
Require Coq.ssr.ssreflect.
Require Coq.ssr.ssrfun.
Require Coq.ssr.ssrbool.
Require Coq.ZArith.ZArith.
Require Coq.QArith.QArith.
Require Coq.Strings.String.
Require Coq.Init.Ltac.
Require Coq.Bool.Bool.
Require Coq.Floats.PrimFloat.
Require Coq.Numbers.Cyclic.Int63.PrimInt63.
Require elpi.elpi.
Require HB.structures.
Require HB.examples.demo2.classical.
Import Coq.ssr.ssreflect Coq.ssr.ssrfun Coq.ssr.ssrbool Coq.ZArith.ZArith Coq.QArith.QArith.
Import HB.structures.
Import HB.examples.demo2.classical.
Declare Scope hb_scope.
Delimit Scope hb_scope with G.
Local Open Scope classical_set_scope.
Local Open Scope hb_scope.
Module Stage10.
HB.mixin Record AddAG_of_TYPE A := {
zero : A;
add : A -> A -> A;
opp : A -> A;
addrA : associative add;
addrC : commutative add;
add0r : left_id zero add;
addNr : left_inverse zero opp add;
}.
HB.structure Definition AddAG := { A of AddAG_of_TYPE A }.
Notation "0" := zero : hb_scope.
Infix "+" := (@add _) : hb_scope.
Notation "- x" := (@opp _ x) : hb_scope.
Notation "x - y" := (x + - y) : hb_scope.
(* Theory *)
Section AddAGTheory.
Variable A : AddAG.type.
Implicit Type (x : A).
Lemma addr0 : right_id (@zero A) add.
Proof. by move=> x; rewrite addrC add0r. Qed.
Lemma addrN : right_inverse (@zero A) opp add.
Proof. by move=> x; rewrite addrC addNr. Qed.
Lemma subrr x : x - x = 0.
Proof. by rewrite addrN. Qed.
Lemma addrK : right_loop (@opp A) (@add A).
Proof. by move=> x y; rewrite -addrA subrr addr0. Qed.
Lemma addKr : left_loop (@opp A) (@add A).
Proof. by move=> x y; rewrite addrA addNr add0r. Qed.
Lemma addrNK : rev_right_loop (@opp A) (@add A).
Proof. by move=> y x; rewrite -addrA addNr addr0. Qed.
Lemma addNKr : rev_left_loop (@opp A) (@add A).
Proof. by move=> x y; rewrite addrA subrr add0r. Qed.
Lemma addrAC : right_commutative (@add A).
Proof. by move=> x y z; rewrite -!addrA [y + z]addrC. Qed.
Lemma addrCA : left_commutative (@add A).
Proof. by move=> x y z; rewrite !addrA [x + y]addrC. Qed.
Lemma addrACA : interchange (@add A) add.
Proof. by move=> x y z t; rewrite !addrA [x + y + z]addrAC. Qed.
Lemma opprK : involutive (@opp A).
Proof. by move=> x; apply: (can_inj (addrK (- x))); rewrite addNr addrN. Qed.
Lemma opprD x y : - (x + y) = - x - y.
Proof.
apply: (can_inj (addKr (x + y))).
by rewrite subrr addrACA !subrr addr0.
Qed.
Lemma opprB x y : - (x - y) = y - x.
Proof. by rewrite opprD opprK addrC. Qed.
End AddAGTheory.
HB.mixin Record Ring_of_AddAG A of AddAG A := {
one : A;
mul : A -> A -> A;
mulrA : associative mul;
mulr1 : left_id one mul;
mul1r : right_id one mul;
mulrDl : left_distributive mul add;
mulrDr : right_distributive mul add;
}.
HB.factory Record Ring_of_TYPE A := {
zero : A;
one : A;
add : A -> A -> A;
opp : A -> A;
mul : A -> A -> A;
addrA : associative add;
addrC : commutative add;
add0r : left_id zero add;
addNr : left_inverse zero opp add;
mulrA : associative mul;
mul1r : left_id one mul;
mulr1 : right_id one mul;
mulrDl : left_distributive mul add;
mulrDr : right_distributive mul add;
}.
HB.builders Context A (a : Ring_of_TYPE A).
HB.instance
Definition to_AddAG_of_TYPE := AddAG_of_TYPE.Build A
_ _ _ addrA addrC add0r addNr.
HB.instance
Definition to_Ring_of_AddAG :=
Ring_of_AddAG.Build A _ _ mulrA mul1r
mulr1 mulrDl mulrDr.
HB.end.
HB.structure Definition Ring := { A of Ring_of_TYPE A }.
Notation "1" := one : hb_scope.
Infix "*" := (@mul _) : hb_scope.
HB.mixin Record Topological T := {
open : (T -> Prop) -> Prop;
open_setT : open setT;
open_bigcup : forall {I} (D : set I) (F : I -> set T),
(forall i, D i -> open (F i)) -> open (\bigcup_(i in D) F i);
open_setI : forall X Y : set T, open X -> open Y -> open (setI X Y);
}.
HB.structure Definition TopologicalSpace := { A of Topological A }.
Hint Extern 0 (open setT) => now apply: open_setT : core.
HB.factory Record TopologicalBase T := {
open_base : set (set T);
open_base_covers : setT `<=` \bigcup_(X in open_base) X;
open_base_cup : forall X Y : set T, open_base X -> open_base Y ->
forall z, (X `&` Y) z -> exists2 Z, open_base Z & Z z /\ Z `<=` X `&` Y
}.
HB.builders Context T (a : TopologicalBase T).
Definition open_of : (T -> Prop) -> Prop :=
[set A | exists2 D, D `<=` open_base & A = \bigcup_(X in D) X].
Lemma open_of_setT : open_of setT. Proof.
exists open_base; rewrite // predeqE => x; split=> // _.
by apply: open_base_covers.
Qed.
Lemma open_of_bigcup {I} (D : set I) (F : I -> set T) :
(forall i, D i -> open_of (F i)) -> open_of (\bigcup_(i in D) F i).
Proof. Admitted.
Lemma open_of_cap X Y : open_of X -> open_of Y -> open_of (X `&` Y).
Proof. Admitted.
HB.instance
Definition to_Topological :=
Topological.Build T _ open_of_setT (@open_of_bigcup) open_of_cap.
HB.end.
Section ProductTopology.
Variables (T1 T2 : TopologicalSpace.type).
Definition prod_open_base :=
[set A | exists (A1 : set T1) (A2 : set T2),
open A1 /\ open A2 /\ A = setM A1 A2].
Lemma prod_open_base_covers : setT `<=` \bigcup_(X in prod_open_base) X.
Proof.
move=> X _; exists setT => //; exists setT, setT; do ?split.
- exact: open_setT.
- exact: open_setT.
- by rewrite predeqE.
Qed.
Lemma prod_open_base_setU X Y :
prod_open_base X -> prod_open_base Y ->
forall z, (X `&` Y) z ->
exists2 Z, prod_open_base Z & Z z /\ Z `<=` X `&` Y.
Proof.
move=> [A1 [A2 [A1open [A2open ->]]]] [B1 [B2 [B1open [B2open ->]]]].
move=> [z1 z2] [[/=Az1 Az2] [/= Bz1 Bz2]].
exists ((A1 `&` B1) `*` (A2 `&` B2)).
by eexists _, _; do ?[split; last first]; apply: open_setI.
by split => // [[x1 x2] [[/=Ax1 Bx1] [/=Ax2 Bx2]]].
Qed.
HB.instance Definition prod_topology :=
TopologicalBase.Build (T1 * T2)%type _ prod_open_base_covers prod_open_base_setU.
End ProductTopology.
Definition continuous {T T' : TopologicalSpace.type} (f : T -> T') :=
forall B : set T', open B -> open (f@^-1` B).
Definition continuous2 {T T' T'': TopologicalSpace.type}
(f : T -> T' -> T'') := continuous (fun xy => f xy.1 xy.2).
HB.mixin Record JoinTAddAG T of AddAG_of_TYPE T & Topological T := {
add_continuous : continuous2 (add : T -> T -> T);
opp_continuous : continuous (opp : T -> T)
}.
HB.structure Definition TAddAG := { A of Topological A & AddAG_of_TYPE A & JoinTAddAG A }.
(* Instance *)
HB.instance Definition Z_ring_axioms :=
Ring_of_TYPE.Build Z 0%Z 1%Z Z.add Z.opp Z.mul
Z.add_assoc Z.add_comm Z.add_0_l Z.add_opp_diag_l
Z.mul_assoc Z.mul_1_l Z.mul_1_r
Z.mul_add_distr_r Z.mul_add_distr_l.
Example test1 (m n : Z) : (m + n) - n + 0 = m.
Proof. by rewrite addrK addr0. Qed.
Import Qcanon.
Search _ Qc "plus" "opp".
Lemma Qcplus_opp_l q : - q + q = 0.
Proof. by rewrite Qcplus_comm Qcplus_opp_r. Qed.
HB.instance Definition Qc_ring_axioms :=
Ring_of_TYPE.Build Qc 0%Qc 1%Qc Qcplus Qcopp Qcmult
Qcplus_assoc Qcplus_comm Qcplus_0_l Qcplus_opp_l
Qcmult_assoc Qcmult_1_l Qcmult_1_r
Qcmult_plus_distr_l Qcmult_plus_distr_r.
Obligation Tactic := idtac.
Definition Qcopen_base : set (set Qc) :=
[set A | exists a b : Qc, forall z, A z <-> a < z /\ z < b].
Program Definition QcTopological := TopologicalBase.Build Qc Qcopen_base _ _.
Next Obligation.
move=> x _; exists [set y | x - 1 < y < x + 1].
by exists (x - 1), (x + 1).
split; rewrite Qclt_minus_iff.
by rewrite -[_ + _]/(x - (x - 1))%G opprB addrCA subrr.
by rewrite -[_ + _]/(x + 1 - x)%G addrAC subrr.
Qed.
Next Obligation.
move=> X Y [aX [bX Xeq]] [aY [bY Yeq]] z [/Xeq [aXz zbX] /Yeq [aYz zbY]].
Admitted.
HB.instance Definition _ : TopologicalBase Qc := QcTopological.
Program Definition QcJoinTAddAG := JoinTAddAG.Build Qc _ _.
Next Obligation. Admitted.
Next Obligation. Admitted.
HB.instance Definition _ : JoinTAddAG Qc := QcJoinTAddAG.
End Stage10.
```

The coqc that's supposed to pass says

```
File "/tmp/tmppwo0hzy0.v", line 241, characters 7-13:
Error: Cannot find module Qcanon
```

CC @Cyril Cohen

I'm spending an extended weekend without my computer ... but I can guess that the import of Qcanon might not be qualified enough in this modified context

Oooooh, I see what went wrong here. The minimizer uses the glob file to resolve `Require`

s into absolute module names. The minimizer tests that one version of Coq fails and another one succeeds. However, it generates the .glob file with the failing version of coqc. Hence any `Require`

s that are below the error do not get resolved, and hence fail when they become `Import`

s. I guess the solution to this is to use the passing coqc to compute the glob file (or else to truncate the file at the error early on).

I've made this into an issue at https://github.com/JasonGross/coq-tools/issues/57, hope to fix it within the next couple of days, and then the minimizer should be more capable of handling coq-elpi and other projects with `Require`

in the middle of files rather than at the top.

Last updated: Sep 09 2024 at 06:02 UTC